Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Charge separation at the interface of heterojunctions is affected by the energy band alignments of the materials that compose the heterojunctions. Controlling the contact crystal facets can lead to different energy band alignments owing to the varied electronic structures of the different crystal facets. Therefore, BiVO 4 ‐TiO 2 heterojunctions are designed with different BiVO 4 crystal facets at the interface (110 facet or 010 facet), named BiVO 4 ‐110‐TiO 2 and BiVO 4 ‐010‐TiO 2, respectively, to achieve high photocatalytic performance. Higher photocurrent density and lower photoluminescence intensity are observed with the BiVO 4 ‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction than those of the BiVO 4 ‐010‐TiO 2 heterojunction, which confirms that the former possesses higher charge carrier separation capacity than the latter. The photocatalytic degradation results of both Rhodamine B and 4‐nonylphenol demonstrate that better photocatalytic performance is achieved on the BiVO 4 ‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction than the BiVO 4 ‐010‐TiO 2 heterojunction under visible light (≥422 nm) irradiation. The higher electron transfer capacity and better photocatalytic performance of the BiVO 4 ‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction are attributed to the more fluent electron transfer from the 110 facet of BiVO 4 to TiO 2 caused by the smaller interfacial energy barrier. This is further confirmed by the selective deposition of Pt on the TiO 2 surface as well as the longer lifetime of Bi 5+ in the BiVO 4 ‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction.
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.