Key result
Echocardiography plays a central role in evaluating cardiac remodeling to differentiate non-ischemic cardiomyopathies from physiological athlete's heart.
Why the study?
How does echocardiography help differentiate non-ischemic cardiomyopathies from physiological adaptations in athlete's heart?
How does echocardiography help differentiate non-ischemic cardiomyopathies from physiological adaptations in athlete's heart?
Echocardiography plays a central role in evaluating cardiac remodeling in athletes to differentiate physiological adaptations from pathological non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Echocardiography supports differentiation of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies from athlete's heart; leaves open need for prospective validation across sports.
Regular exercise training induces several cardiac physiological adaptations commonly referred as “athlete's heart.” These changes can overlap pathological findings present in several cardiac diseases, mainly cardiomyopathies, associated with sudden cardiac death. The differentiation between physiological and pathological findings is often challenging and clinical decision making in such cases can be difficult: missing a condition associated with an increased risk of life‐threatening events has significant clinical impact, whereas the disqualification of a healthy athlete from competition can lead to severe psychological and socioeconomic burden. Echocardiography assumes a central role to evaluate cardiac remodeling in athletes. This paper provides an up‐to‐date and practical review of the role of echocardiography in differentiation non‐ischemic cardiomyopathies from “athlete's heart.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dores et al. (2017) conducted a review in Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies and athlete's heart. Echocardiography was evaluated. Echocardiography plays a central role in evaluating cardiac remodeling to differentiate non-ischemic cardiomyopathies from physiological athlete's heart.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: