Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Our laboratory discovered that CD4-positive (CD4+) T cells of the immune system convey transitory neuroprotection to injured mouse facial motoneurons (FMNs) (Serpe et al., 1999, 2000, 2003). A fundamental question in the mechanisms responsible for neuroprotection concerns the identity of the cell(s) that serves as the antigen-presenting cell (APC) to activate the CD4+ T cells. Here, we first establish that CD4+ T cells reactive to non-CNS antigen fail to support FMN survival and, second, demonstrate a two-compartment model of CD4+ T cell activation. Mouse bone marrow (BM) chimeras were developed that discriminate between resident antigen-presenting host cell and BM-derived antigen-presenting donor cell expression of major histocompatibility complex II within central and peripheral compartments, respectively. After facial nerve transection, neither compartment alone is sufficient to result in activated CD4+ T cell-mediated FMN survival. Rather, CD4+ T cell-mediated neuroprotection appears to depend on both resident microglial cells in the central compartment and a BM-derived APC in the peripheral compartment. This is the first in vivo report demonstrating a neuroprotective mechanism requiring APC functions by resident (i.e., parenchymal) microglial cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byram et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: