The effect of temperature and humidity on formaldehyde emissions from samples collected from temporary housing units (THUs) was studied. The THUs were supplied by the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) to families that lost their homes in Louisiana and Mississippi during the Hurricane Katrina and Rita disasters. On the basis of a previous study, four of the composite wood surface materials that dominated contributions to indoor formaldehyde were selected to analyze the effects of temperature and humidity on the emission factors. Humidity equilibration experiments were carried out on two of the samples to determine how long the samples take to equilibrate with the surrounding environmental conditions. Small chamber experiments were then conducted to measure emission factors for the four surface materials at various temperature and humidity conditions. The samples were analyzed for formaldehyde via high-performance liquid chromatography. The experiments showed that increases in temperature or humidity contributed to an increase in emission factors. A linear regression model was built using the natural log of the percent relative humidity (RH) and inverse of temperature (in K) as independent variables and the natural log of emission factors as the dependent variable. The coefficients for the inverse of temperature and log RH with log emission factor were found to be statistically significant for all of the samples at the 95% confidence level. This study should assist in retrospectively estimating indoor formaldehyde exposure of occupants of THUs. IMPLICATIONS Maddalena et al. reported differences between formalde-hyde concentrations in samples collected from the THUs during the morning and afternoon of the same day, highlighting the need to carry out further analysis on the effect of temperature and humidity on formaldehyde emissions. This study addresses the influence of temperature and humidity on formaldehyde emission factors from individual materials. The information provided can be incorporated into an exposure assessment study for the occupants of the FEMA trailers. However, because the experiments are carried out only on four samples from the THUs, they might not be representative of the entire fleet of THUs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parthasarathy et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: