Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper advances a heuristic distinction between “model” (in the Geertzian sense of “model-for”) and “example” as contrasting modes of articulating thought and action in the Anthropocene. I argue that the distinction is helpful in understanding the ontological presuppositions of geo-engineering as a technopolitical fix. Finally, I draw the outlines of a notion of “ontological anarchism” as the proper meta-mode of existence of the Anthropocene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eduardo Viveiros de Castro (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: