Key result
Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with an increased hazard of developing albuminuria (HR 1.143; 95% CI 1.008-1.302) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure increase the risk of developing or progressing albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=354)
Does visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure increase the risk of developing or progressing albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability is an independent risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SBP variability may flag albuminuria risk in type 2 diabetes; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Recent study has suggested that not only the presence of hypertension but also the variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) are risk factors for vascular disease and organ damage. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between visit-to-visit variability in SBP and change in urinary albumin excretion (UAE) or development of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured SBP in 354 consecutive patients at every visit during 1 year and calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of SBP. We performed a follow-up study to assess change in UAE or development of albuminuria, the mean interval of which was 3.76 ± 0.71 years. Then, we evaluated relationships of variability of SBP to diabetic nephropathy using multiple regression analysis and multiple Cox regression model. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that CV of SBP was independently associated with change in UAE (β = 0.1758; P = 0.0108). Adjusted Cox regression analyses demonstrated that CV of SBP was associated with an increased hazard of development of albuminuria; hazard ratio was 1.143 (95% CI 1.008-1.302). CONCLUSIONS: Visit-to-visit variability in SBP could be a novel risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=354). Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure was evaluated on Development of albuminuria (HR 1.143, 95% CI 1.008-1.302). Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with an increased hazard of developing albuminuria (HR 1.143; 95% CI 1.008-1.302) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: