Key result
Focus-guided biopsy boosts diagnostic sensitivity to 100% vs 80% for ARVD.
Why the study?
Does focus-guided endomyocardial biopsy improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in patients undergoing ablation for ventricular arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=122)
No
Does focus-guided endomyocardial biopsy improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in patients undergoing ablation for ventricular arrhythmias?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 80%
Targeting endomyocardial biopsy to the mapped area of ventricular ectopy significantly improves diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.
May support focus-guided EMB for ARVD diagnosis during ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is one of diagnostical tools for arrhythmogenic dysplasia of the right ventricle (ADRB). However sensitivity and specificity of EMB relay on the methodics of its performing. Aim. To compare “focus-guided” and “voluntary” EMB in diagnostics of ADRB in patients, scheduled for catheter ablation of ventricular rhythm disorders. Material and methods. To retrospective study 122 patients included, among those scheduled for catheter ablation of ventricular tachicardia and sympthomatic ventricular extrasystoly, underwent EMB (64 males, mean age 39±14 y.). Patients were selected to 2 groups: 1) 44 patients (36%) with “focus-guided” biopsy (minimum 1 fragment of endomyocardium from the area(s) of ectopy); 2) 78 patients (64%) with “voluntary” EMB (specimens taken from any area except the focus). Results. Sixteen (13,1%) patients took the definite dignosis of ADRB according to 2010 Criteria. Short-term effect of ablation reached 69,7% of patients, much less efficacy had ADRB group (43,8%). Sensitivity and specificity of EMB in the big criteria of ADRB revealing, by histology, was higher in the group with “focus-guided” EMB, comparing to the “voluntary” group (100% and 91,7% vs. 80% and 81,4%, respectively). Conclusion. To improve sensitivity and specificity of EMB in ADRB diagnostics it is aimful to take myocardium specimens from the area of researched ventricular ectopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Симонова et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Ventricular arrhythmias scheduled for catheter ablation (n=122). Focus-guided endomyocardial biopsy vs. Voluntary endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated on Sensitivity for major histological criteria of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Focus-guided endomyocardial biopsy from the area of ventricular ectopy demonstrated higher sensitivity (100% vs 80%) and specificity (91.7% vs 81.4%) for histological diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia compared to voluntary biopsy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: