Key result
A developed nomogram incorporating demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors demonstrated good predictive performance for depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease, achieving an AUC of 0.785 in the training set.
Why the study?
Depression is common among patients with chronic kidney disease and is associated with poor outcomes, prompting the need to predict depression risk in this population.
Does a nomogram based on demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors accurately predict depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,414)
Does a nomogram based on demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors accurately predict depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.785 (95% CI 0.761-0.809)
A newly developed nomogram incorporating demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors demonstrated good predictive performance for identifying depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Nomogram may support depression risk stratification in CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires external validation before clinical use.
Depression is common among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with poor outcomes. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting depression risk in patients with CKD. This cross-sectional study utilized data from the 2005–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Participants were randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3 ratio). A nomogram was developed based on predictors identified using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. A total of 4414 participants were included. Gender, age, race, poverty-to-income ratio, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, trouble sleeping, sleep hours, and smoking were included as predictors in the nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram for predicting depression risk in patients with CKD was 0.785 (95% CI: 0.761–0.809) in the training set and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.737–0.810) in the validation set. The corrected C-index, calculated using bootstrap resampling, was 0.776, indicating good predictive performance. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis showed good calibration and clinical utility. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses further confirmed the robustness of the nomogram. A web-based risk calculator based on the nomogram was developed to enhance clinical applicability. A flowchart demonstrating the application of the nomogram for risk assessment and clinical decision-making in routine practice is provided. This nomogram effectively predicts depression risk in patients with CKD and may serve as a user-friendly tool for the early identification of patients with CKD at high risk for depression using key demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors. A nomogram was developed using key demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors to predict depression risk in CKD patients. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive performance, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirming its robustness. This nomogram may serve as a user-friendly tool for the early identification of CKD patients at high risk for depression. A flowchart demonstrating the application of the nomogram for risk assessment and clinical decision-making in routine practice is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=4,414). Demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle risk factors vs. Unexposed/reference groups was evaluated on Prediction of depression risk (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) (AUC 0.785, 95% CI 0.761-0.809). A developed nomogram incorporating demographic, comorbid, and lifestyle factors demonstrated good predictive performance for depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease, achieving an AUC of 0.785 in the training set.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: