Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigates the use of machine learning techniques and the proper selection of input data to estimate permeability in geosciences, using six types of input logs: gamma ray (GR), resistivity (RT), effective porosity (PHIE), density (RHO), sonic (DT), and compensated neutron porosity (NPHI). A total of 57 models were constructed using combinations of these logs and tested using five machine learning methods: Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). This approach produced 285 unique permeability predictions. RF had the highest correlation coefficient (0.925) and average error (0.196), indicating a precision-correlation trade-off. The ELM approach had the lowest average error, 0.083, and a correlation value of 0.871. Testing on a blind well revealed that the GB and RF approaches were highly effective in predicting permeability, with R² values of 0.92 and 0.90, respectively, even in untested settings. The findings emphasize the need of using appropriate machine learning algorithms and input data to improve model accuracy and reliability.
Davari et al. (Fri,) studied this question.