Key result
Inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling is linked to ~10-point higher percent intimal hyperplasia post-stenting.
Why the study?
Does inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling increase intimal hyperplasia after single-stent implantation in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
Cohort (n=58)
No
Does inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling increase intimal hyperplasia after single-stent implantation in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 41% vs 31%
p-value: p=0.049
Inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling is associated with increased vessel stretching and greater subsequent intimal hyperplasia after coronary stenting.
Inadequate remodeling may flag higher neointimal risk after stenting; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The impact of vascular remodeling pattern on intimal hyperplasia (IH) after coronary stenting is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: The preintervention remodeling pattern of the lesion might be associated with IH after the coronary stenting procedure. METHODS: Serial (pre-, post-stent implantation, and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained in 58 patients with single-stent implantation (GFX stents in 41 and NIR in 17). The matching IVUS image slices at the preintervention lesion site were selected for serial comparisons. The remodeling index (RI) was defined as lesion/proximal reference external elastic membrane cross-sectional area (CSA) at preintervention lesion site. Adequate remodeling was defined as a RI > 0.95 and inadequate remodeling as a RI < or = 0.95. Vessel stretching, percent vessel stretching, and percent IH CSA, as well as pre- and postintervention IVUS variables were evaluated according to the remodeling pattern. RESULTS: The percent IH CSA was 31% in adequate remodeling (n = 29, mean RI = 1.05) and 41% in inadequate remodeling (n = 29, mean RI = 0.88) (p = 0.049). Percent vessel stretching was 15% in adequate remodeling and 22% in inadequate remodeling (p = 0.007). The RI inversely correlated with percent vessel stretching (r = -0.435, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with preintervention adequate remodeling, inadequate remodeling was associated with increased percent IH CSA, which might be related with more vessel stretching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Nonostial de novo native coronary artery lesions requiring stenting (n=58). Inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling (remodeling index ≤ 0.95) vs. Adequate preintervention arterial remodeling (remodeling index > 0.95) was evaluated on Percent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (CSA) at follow-up (p=0.049). Inadequate preintervention arterial remodeling was associated with a higher percent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area after coronary stenting compared with adequate remodeling (41% vs 31%, p=0.049).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: