Key result
De novo unstable angina was associated with a significantly larger coronary arterial remodeling index (18.6) compared to accelerating unstable angina (5.3, p=0.0347) and stable angina (-2.7, p=0.0005).
Why the study?
Does coronary arterial remodeling differ among patients with different clinical presentations of angina pectoris?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Does coronary arterial remodeling differ among patients with different clinical presentations of angina pectoris?
Positive coronary arterial remodeling is more prevalent in patients with new-onset unstable angina compared to accelerating unstable or stable angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Larger remodeling in de novo unstable angina may reflect distinct biology; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Coronary arterial remodeling influences the clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease; however, there is little information on the relationship between coronary arterial remodeling and the type of angina pectoris that patients manifest. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to determine the difference of coronary arterial remodeling in patients with different types of angina pectoris. METHODS: We analyzed 100 patients with ischemic heart disease using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Intracoronary IVUS images of proximal reference (PR), distal reference (DR), and target lesion were recorded, and intraluminal area (LA) and external elastic membrane (EEM) were measured. We defined a remodeling index as 100 x (lesion EEM - [PR-EEM + DR-EEM]/2) / ([PR-EEM + DR-EEM]/2). Cases were classified into three groups according to the clinical history (Group 1a: de novo unstable angina pectoris, Group 1b: accelerating unstable angina pectoris, and Group 2; stable angina pectoris). RESULTS: The remodeling index in Group 1a was significantly larger than that in Groups 1b and 2 (18.6 +/- 28.5 vs. 5.3 +/- 27.1 and 18.6 +/- 28.5 vs. -2.7 +/- 17.6, p = 0.0347 and p = 0.0005, respectively), but there was no statistical difference in remodeling index between Groups 1b and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that positive coronary arterial remodeling is more prevalent in patients with new onset of angina pectoris. The specific type of coronary arterial remodeling may affect the clinical presentation of patients with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishioka et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic heart disease (n=100). De novo unstable angina pectoris vs. Accelerating unstable angina and stable angina was evaluated on Coronary arterial remodeling index (p=0.0347 and 0.0005). De novo unstable angina was associated with a significantly larger coronary arterial remodeling index (18.6) compared to accelerating unstable angina (5.3, p=0.0347) and stable angina (-2.7, p=0.0005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: