Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Previous empirical behavior analysis on Autonomous Vehicles (AV) mainly focused on vehicles with Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system due to the lack of high-level AV dataset. Recently released SAE Level-4 AV datasets such as the Waymo Open Dataset provide great opportunities to evaluate their behavioral impact on traffic flow. In this study, we aim to characterize the empirical Car Following (CF) behaviors of the Waymo autonomous vehicle and compare its feature with human-driven Vehicles (HV), and capture such behavioral differences using the IDM CF model. Our main findings include: (a) AV is much safer than HV, based on our analysis using surrogate safety measures, as time headways and jam spacings of the AV are significantly larger than HV; (b) the response time of AV is also significantly larger than that of HV in response to various types of stimuli; (c) despite the short length of trajectories in the Waymo Open Dataset, we have confirmed that these trajectories are suitable for calibrating some of the IDM parameters; and the calibration results of IDM are consistent with our empirical analysis. Moreover, the modelling results, reveal that the proportion of string unstable behavior of AV is less than that of HV; and (d) for HV, there is generally no significant difference between following AV and following HV except a smaller jam spacing when following AV. Overall, we conclude that currently AV behaves in a conservative way to ensure its safety at the cost of traffic efficiency.
Hu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.