Key result
South Asian and former Yugoslavian immigrants show no decline in AMI incidence versus native Norwegians.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine time trends in incidence rates of acute myocardial infarction and stroke among immigrant groups in Norway, focusing on immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia.
Do incidence trends for acute myocardial infarction and stroke differ between immigrant groups and the Norwegian-born population?
Observational (n=3,636,847)
Do incidence trends for acute myocardial infarction and stroke differ between immigrant groups and the Norwegian-born population?
Immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia living in Norway are missing the cardiovascular health improvements seen in the native-born population, underscoring an urgent need for targeted preventative interventions.
May warrant targeted AMI prevention research in these immigrant groups; leaves open drivers of divergent trends and intervention effects.
AIMS: We aimed to study time trends of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke incidence rates among immigrant groups living in Norway, with a special focus on immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia. METHODS: All incident AMI and stroke events were identified in Norwegian residents aged 35-79 years during 1996-2019 using hospital and cause of death registry data. A 3-year wash-out period was used to identify incident events. Thus, cases were counted from 1999 onwards. We calculated annual age-standardised incidence rates using direct standardisation. Poisson regression was used to calculate the average annual change in incidence rates of AMI and stroke and to study differences between immigrant groups and the Norwegian-born population. RESULTS: Age-standardised incidence rates of AMI were higher in immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia than in the Norwegian-born population. For Norwegian-born men and women, and former Yugoslavian women, the annual age-standardised AMI incidence rates declined over the study period by 2.4%, 2.0% and 2.3%, respectively. South Asian men and women and former Yugoslavian men did not experience such a decline, although there was an apparent decline in the last 3 years of the period for South Asian men. For former Yugoslavian men, this resulted in increasing differences compared with Norwegian-born men. For stroke, all these groups had declining trends in incidence rates, and former Yugoslavian women had the strongest decline of 4.3% annually. CONCLUSION: During 1999-2019, immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia did not experience the same beneficial decline in AMI incidence as the Norwegian-born population. However, both immigrant groups experienced similar or larger declines in the incidence of stroke as Norwegian-born men and women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabanal et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction and stroke incidence (n=3,636,847). Immigrant status (specifically from South Asia and former Yugoslavia) vs. Norwegian-born population was evaluated on Annual change in age-standardised incidence rates of AMI (Declines of 2.4% (Norwegian-born men) and 2.0% (Norwegian-born women) annually, versus no significant decline in South Asian men/women and former Yugoslavian men). Immigrants from South Asia and former Yugoslavia did not experience the beneficial declines in acute myocardial infarction incidence seen in the Norwegian-born population from 1999 to 2019.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: