Retrospective case-control study identifies associations of anterior larynx with dysmorphism in children.
OBJECTIVE: The literature on the entity of the anterior larynx (AL) is restricted to little evidence on the difficulty encountered in exposing the larynx for intubation, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and scant reports on its prevalence in general adults and children. Here, we describe the prevalence of AL in a series of children presenting with aerodigestive symptoms and explore its association with functional abnormalities, congenital and structural anomalies or conditions. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric centre. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study. Using a prospectively collected surgical database, we identified patients diagnosed with AL (Grades IIb-III-IV Modified Cormack-Lehane scale) and sex and age-matched controls who had undergone full airway endoscopy for aerodigestive symptoms. We collected the demographics, presentations, associated diagnoses and investigations. We compared the proportion of patients with large airway abnormalities and dysmorphism and estimated the prevalence of AL. RESULTS: Over a 5.5-year period, 58 children with AL (28 females, mean age 0.38 years) were matched with 58 controls (mean age 0.42 years). Although both groups presented with permutations of stridor, respiratory failure, cyanotic spells, swallowing and feeding difficulties and SDB, AL presented much more with swallowing and feeding problems (33 vs. 20, p < .05). There were significantly more children with dysmorphism in the AL group (29 vs. 9, p < .05). The prevalence of AL was 4.9% (SE 0.0063). CONCLUSIONS: AL was detected in 4.9% of a sample of children who had undergone airway examination for aerodigestive symptoms. It is significantly associated with dysmorphism, and swallowing difficulties that warrant instrumental evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smaily et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: