Key result
Following ICD implantation, over one-third of patients resumed driving during the restricted period, but only 0.2% reported receiving an ICD shock while driving.
Why the study?
Patients are restricted from driving after ICD implantation or shock, but patient awareness of and adherence to these restrictions, as well as the occurrence of shocks while driving, were unclear.
What is the level of awareness and adherence to driving restrictions following ICD implantation, and what is the risk of experiencing an ICD shock while driving?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,741)
Yes
What is the level of awareness and adherence to driving restrictions following ICD implantation, and what is the risk of experiencing an ICD shock while driving?
Despite poor awareness and adherence to driving restrictions following ICD implantation, the rate of ICD shocks while driving and subsequent harm is very low.
Low shock rates while driving despite poor adherence; leaves open whether restrictions warrant reevaluation in prospective studies.
AIMS: Patients are restricted from driving following implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation or shock. We sought to investigate how many patients are aware of, and adhere to, the driving restrictions, and what proportion experience an ICD shock or other cardiac symptoms while driving. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a nationwide survey of all living Danish residents 18 years or older who received a first-time ICD between 2013 and 2016 (n = 3913) and linked their responses with nationwide registers. Of 2741 respondents (47% primary prevention, 83% male, median age 67 years), 2513 (92%) held a valid driver's license at ICD implantation, 175 (7%) of whom had a license for professional driving. Many drivers were unaware of driving restrictions: primary prevention 58%; secondary prevention 36%; post-appropriate shock 28%; professional drivers 55%. Almost all (94%) resumed non-professional driving after ICD implantation, more than one-third during the restricted period; 35% resumed professional driving. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, 5 (0.2%) reported receiving an ICD shock while driving, one of which resulted in a traffic accident. The estimated risk of harm was 0.0002% per person-year. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, many ICD patients were unaware of driving restrictions, and more than one third resumed driving during a driving restriction period. However, the rate of reported ICD shocks while driving was very low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjerre et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation (n=2,741). First-time ICD implantation was evaluated on Awareness of and adherence to driving restrictions, and ICD shocks while driving. Following ICD implantation, over one-third of patients resumed driving during the restricted period, but only 0.2% reported receiving an ICD shock while driving.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: