Key result
People with and without diabetes experienced similar proportional changes in hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, though diabetes conferred a 3.5- to 5-fold higher risk of events.
Why the study?
Do trends in hospital admission rates for major cardiovascular events and procedures differ between people with and without diabetes?
Observational
Yes
Do trends in hospital admission rates for major cardiovascular events and procedures differ between people with and without diabetes?
Hospital admission rates for major cardiovascular events declined similarly for patients with and without diabetes in England between 2004 and 2009, though the absolute risk remains substantially higher in diabetic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CVD admission declines occurred in diabetes; confirms broad risk factor gains but leaves open whether disparities versus nondiabetes are narrowing.
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether people with and without diabetes equally benefitted from reductions in cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to compare recent trends in hospital admission rates for angina, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) among people with and without diabetes in England. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all patients aged >16 years with cardiovascular events in England between 2004-2005 and 2009-2010 using national hospital activity data. Diabetes- and nondiabetes-specific rates were calculated for each year. To test for time trend, we fitted Poisson regression models. RESULTS: In people with diabetes, admission rates for angina, AMI, and CABG decreased significantly by 5% (rate ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.94-0.96]), 5% (0.95 [0.93-0.97]), and 3% (0.97 [0.95-0.98]) per year, respectively. Admission rates for stroke did not significantly change (0.99 [0.98-1.004]) but increased for PCI (1.01 [1.005-1.03]) in people with diabetes. People with and without diabetes experienced similar proportional changes for all outcomes, with no significant differences in trends between these groups. However, diabetes was associated with an ~3.5- to 5-fold risk of CVD events. In-hospital mortality rates declined for AMI and stroke, remained unchanged for CABG, and increased for PCI admissions in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This national study suggests similar changes in admissions for CVD in people with and without diabetes. Aggressive risk reduction is needed to further reduce the high absolute and relative risk of CVD still present in people with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vamos et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular events. Diabetes vs. Without diabetes was evaluated on Annual trend in hospital admission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Rate ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). People with and without diabetes experienced similar proportional changes in hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, though diabetes conferred a 3.5- to 5-fold higher risk of events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: