Key result
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in dysfunctional bioprosthetic valves significantly reduced right ventricular pressure from 82.2 to 59.4 mmHg (P<0.001) at 24 hours.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation improve hemodynamics in children with dysfunctional surgically implanted bioprosthetic valves in the RVOT?
Observational (n=14)
Does percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation improve hemodynamics in children with dysfunctional surgically implanted bioprosthetic valves in the RVOT?
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is feasible and safe for treating RVOT dysfunction in previously implanted bioprosthetic valves in children, yielding significant short-term hemodynamic improvements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PPVI feasibility in dysfunctional bioprosthetic pulmonary valves in children; leaves open durability versus surgery.
AIMS: Replacement of bioprosthetic valves in the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) is inevitable due to acquired valvar dysfunction. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) may result in acceptable clinical improvement avoiding surgical reintervention. To report outcomes of PPVI in dysfunctional surgically implanted bioprosthetic valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: All children undergoing PPVI into a bioprosthetic pulmonary valve between October 2005 and February 2008 were reviewed. Acute haemodynamic changes were compared and an analysis of variance applied to assess changes in ventricular geometry and pressure over time. Fourteen children (seven males), median weight 57.8 kg and 14.7 years of age were identified, with an echocardiographic RVOT gradient of 59.6 +/- 26.8 mmHg and a pulmonary regurgitation (PR) grade of 3.6 +/- 0.8 (out of 4). Implantation was successful in all. Twenty-four hours after implantation, there was a significant improvement in RV pressure (RVP) (from 82.2 +/- 15.6 to 59.4 +/- 9.9 mmHg, P < 0.001) and degree of PR to 0.6 +/- 0.9 (P < 0.001). Mean hospital stay was 2.0 +/- 0.4 days. Freedom from reintervention was 92 and 89% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography (mean 12.9 +/- 9.8 months) revealed a further reduction in RVP (P < 0.001) and RVOT gradients (P < 0.001) and an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (P= 0.01) and aortic valve annulus diameters (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation for RVOT dysfunction in a previously implanted prosthetic valve is feasible and safe. Short-term follow-up data are encouraging, yet longer-term information is required to determine if this form of palliation has a significant impact on management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asoh et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Right ventricular outflow tract bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (n=14). Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on Right ventricular pressure at 24 hours (p=< 0.001). Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in dysfunctional bioprosthetic valves significantly reduced right ventricular pressure from 82.2 to 59.4 mmHg (P<0.001) at 24 hours.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: