Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) and bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) has led to the successful application of cancer immunotherapy. The potential reactivity mediated by CAR- and BiTE-redirected T cells needs to be assessed to facilitate the application of these treatment options to a broader range of patients. Here, we have generated CAR and BiTE possessing the same single chain fragment variable (scFv) specific for the HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1 157-165 complex (A2/NY-ESO-1 157 ). Using HLA-A2 + NY-ESO-1 + myeloma cells and peptides presented by HLA-A2 molecules as a model, both sets of redirected T cells recognized and killed HLA-A2 + NY-ESO-1 + myeloma cells in an A2/NY-ESO-1 157 -specific manner in vitro . Moreover, CAR- and BiTE-activated T cells showed similar functional avidity, as assessed by cytokine production and killing activity, both displaying antitumor reactivity against HLA-A2 + NY-ESO-1 + myeloma cells in vivo . Interestingly, cross-reactivity for homologous peptides presented by HLA-A*02:01 and NY-ESO-1 157 peptide presented by HLA-A2 alleles was not identical between CAR- and BiTE-redirected T cells, probably due to structural differences of modified antibodies. These results have demonstrated that both antitumor CAR- and BiTE-activated T cells have comparable potential to recognize tumors, while paying attention to unknown off-target reactivity that would differ for each antibody-based modality even if the same scFv was employed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruta et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: