Key result
Pure fruit and vegetable juices linked to lower cardiovascular disease risk comparable to whole produce.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While it is widely accepted that fruit and vegetables (F&V) lower the risk of cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the role of pure fruit and vegetable (PFV) juices is often downplayed. This review poses two questions: Are the protective benefits of F&V dependent upon constituents lacking in PFV juices (e.g. fibre)? Do PFV juices impact on disease risk when considered separately from F&V? Studies comparing the effects of fibre and antioxidants were reviewed, yielding the finding that the impact of F&V may relate more strongly to antioxidants, than to fibre. For the second question, high-quality published studies that considered PFV juices were reviewed. The impact of PFV juices on cancer risk was weakly positive, although a lack of human data and contradictory findings hampered conclusions. For CVD, there was convincing evidence from epidemiological and clinical studies that PFV juices reduced risk via a number of probable mechanisms. It was concluded that the view that PFV juices are nutritionally inferior to F&V, in relation to chronic disease risk reduction, is unjustified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruxton et al. (2006) conducted a review in Cancer and cardiovascular disease. Pure fruit and vegetable juices vs. Whole fruit and vegetables was evaluated on Cancer and cardiovascular disease risk. Pure fruit and vegetable juices reduced cardiovascular disease risk based on epidemiological and clinical evidence, suggesting they are not nutritionally inferior to whole fruits and vegetables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: