Key result
Analysis of rhinovirus capsid-binding compounds revealed two rhinovirus groups (A and B) with differential sensitivity, sequence divergence, and group B producing over twice as many clinical infections.
Rhinoviruses can be divided into two groups based on their sensitivity to capsid-binding antiviral compounds, which correlates with genetic divergence and clinical pathogenicity.
Challenges uniform spectrum assumptions for capsid binders; leaves open serotype-specific optimization for rhinovirus antivirals.
A variety of chemically different compounds inhibit the replication of several serotypes of rhinoviruses (common-cold viruses). We noticed that one of these antiviral compounds, WIN 51711, had an antiviral spectrum clearly distinctive from a consensus spectrum or other capsid-binding compounds, although all of them were shown to share the same binding site. A systematic evaluation of all known rhinovirus capsid-binding compounds against all serotyped rhinoviruses was therefore initiated. Multivariate analysis of the results revealed the existence of two groups of rhinoviruses, which we will call antiviral groups A and B. The differential sensitivity of members of these groups to antiviral compounds suggests the existence of a dimorphic binding site. The antiviral groups turned out to be a reflection of a divergence of rhinovirus serotypes on a much broader level. Similarities in antiviral spectra were highly correlated with sequence similarities, not only of amino acids lining the antiviral compound-binding-site, but also of amino acids of the whole VP1 protein. Furthermore, analysis of epidemiological data indicated that group B rhinoviruses produced more than twice as many clinical infections per serotype than group A rhinoviruses did. Rhinoviruses belonging to the minor receptor group were without exception all computed to lie in the same region of antiviral group B.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andries et al. (1990) studied Rhinovirus infection. Rhinovirus capsid-binding compounds was evaluated on Antiviral sensitivity and sequence divergence. Analysis of rhinovirus capsid-binding compounds revealed two rhinovirus groups (A and B) with differential sensitivity, sequence divergence, and group B producing over twice as many clinical infections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: