Key result
Routine preoperative Group and Save testing in 755 cholecystectomy patients resulted in 1,422 samples being processed, with only one patient (0.1%) requiring a perioperative red blood cell transfusion.
Why the study?
Perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion are uncommon in cholecystectomy, yet routine group and save testing is frequently performed, posing economic and environmental burdens.
Is routine preoperative group and save testing necessary for patients undergoing cholecystectomy?
Cohort (n=755)
No
Is routine preoperative group and save testing necessary for patients undergoing cholecystectomy?
Routine preoperative group and save testing in cholecystectomy is largely unnecessary and contributes to significant economic and environmental burdens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective over routine preoperative G&S testing; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Background and objective Cholecystectomy is among the most frequently performed elective day-case surgeries in the UK, with a growing emphasis on same-day discharge. Although perioperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusion are uncommon with this procedure, routine group and save (G&S) testing is frequently performed for cholecystectomy, contributing to both a significant economic and environmental burden. This study aimed to assess the proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomy who had preoperative G&S testing and to identify how many required a perioperative blood transfusion. Methods This study involved a retrospective analysis of 755 consecutive adult elective or emergency cholecystectomy procedures performed over a two-year period between August 2022 to 2024 in a North West England NHS trust. Patients were assessed from admission through to discharge. Data collected included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, surgical urgency, the number of preoperative G&S tests performed, and the incidence of perioperative red cell transfusion. Results Our cohort included 755 patients: 728 (96.4%) underwent total cholecystectomy, with 27 (3.6%) having associated cholecystectomy procedures. Seven hundred (92.7%) patients had an elective procedure, while 55 (7.3%) underwent an emergency cholecystectomy. The mean patient age was 49 years. Of the cohort, 159 patients (21%) were classified as ASA grade 1, 491 (65%) as ASA grade 2, and 105 (14%) as ASA grade 3. A total of 1,422 G&S samples were submitted for this cohort; 481 patients (64%) had two samples taken, while 92 patients (12%) had more than two G&S tests performed. Only one patient required a red cell transfusion, and two patients required a return to theatre due to anaemia secondary to haemorrhage. Conclusions Our findings suggest that routine preoperative G&S testing is not required in cholecystectomy, given the paucity of blood product transfusions. Unnecessary G&S testing costs our trust approximately £24,000 and consumes around 2,480 hours of laboratory time. This practice also imposes a considerable financial and environmental burden due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with the testing process. A more selective and stratified approach to G&S testing in cholecystectomy may prove beneficial in economic terms and work in synergy with the goal of improving sustainability in the NHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moss et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cholecystectomy (n=755). Preoperative Group and Save (G&S) testing was evaluated on Number of G&S tests performed per patient and incidence of perioperative red cell transfusion. Routine preoperative Group and Save testing in 755 cholecystectomy patients resulted in 1,422 samples being processed, with only one patient (0.1%) requiring a perioperative red blood cell transfusion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: