Key result
None of the 200 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy required a perioperative blood transfusion, indicating that routine pre-operative group and save testing may be unnecessary.
Why the study?
Pre-surgical group and save tests are routine but can result in unnecessary expense and theatre delays, prompting an evaluation of their necessity and cost implications prior to emergency appendectomy.
Is routine G&S testing necessary and cost-effective for patients undergoing emergency appendectomy?
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
No
Is routine G&S testing necessary and cost-effective for patients undergoing emergency appendectomy?
Routine pre-operative group and save testing for emergency appendectomies may be unnecessary due to the minimal risk of perioperative blood transfusion, and omitting it could yield financial savings.
May support selective over routine G&S for appendectomy; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Background Pre-surgical group and save (G&S) tests are routine but can result in unnecessary expense and theatre delays. The objective of this study was to assess the necessity of G&S testing prior to appendectomy and evaluate the cost implications. Methods This retrospective study analysed the records of 200 patients with appendicitis who underwent emergency appendectomies at a busy general surgery department between March 2021 to August 2022. The study adhered to local clinical governance unit protocol and the Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCCS) guidelines. Patients who had elective appendectomies or other emergency procedures were excluded. Data was collected on age, gender, number of samples and requirement for perioperative transfusion. Comparisons were drawn between patients who underwent laparoscopic, open or converted emergency appendectomies. Results Of the sample population, (median age 32, 55.5% male), 93.5% had valid preoperative G&S tests. None required perioperative blood transfusions. 26% of the patients only required one sample for a valid G&S due to having previous sample in the lab; 55% required two samples; 7% needed a third sample because one initial sample was rejected; and 5.5% required four samples because the initial two samples were rejected. The total cost of these samples was estimated to be £3,500.14. Conclusion Emergency appendectomy poses minimal risk of resulting in the need for blood transfusions. Reevaluating the need for routine preoperative G&S testing and adopting a risk-benefit analysis approach could have a financial benefit for the NHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Emergency appendicitis (n=200). Routine pre-operative group and save (G&S) testing was evaluated on Requirement for perioperative blood transfusion. None of the 200 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy required a perioperative blood transfusion, indicating that routine pre-operative group and save testing may be unnecessary.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: