Key result
Endurance and power training in spinal cord injured athletes did not elicit statistically significant differences in left ventricular structural or functional measurements compared to sedentary controls.
Why the study?
Does endurance or power training induce left ventricular structural adaptation in spinal cord injured athletes compared to sedentary spinal cord injured subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
Does endurance or power training induce left ventricular structural adaptation in spinal cord injured athletes compared to sedentary spinal cord injured subjects?
Athletic training in spinal cord injured individuals does not appear to elicit the distinctive patterns of left ventricular enlargement typically seen in able-bodied athletes.
Supports distinct LV remodeling patterns in SCI athletes; leaves open whether findings alter screening or risk stratification.
PURPOSE: The distinctive nature of left ventricular (LV) adaptation reported in able-bodied endurance- and power-trained athletes probably reflects the different hemodynamic loading patterns that occur during acute exercise. The exercise-induced hemodynamic loads in spinal cord injured athletes are different to those in able-bodied counterparts (lower venous return and stroke volume, higher heart rate). We sought to test the hypothesis that wall thickness, but not chamber dimension, would be larger in endurance- and power-trained spinal cord injured athletes compared with sedentary spinal cord injured subjects. METHODS: We undertook resting two-dimensional, motion-mode, and Doppler examinations of 11 power-trained, 10 endurance-trained, and 5 sedentary spinal cord injured volunteers and compared structural and functional LV data by using ANOVA. LV structural data were also analyzed after being scaled to body mass (BM)(0.33). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among groups for any of the LV structural or functional measurements. However, there was a trend for larger mean wall thickness (0.95 +/- 0.12 vs 0.83 +/- 0.10 cm) and left ventricular mass (193 +/- 57 vs 164 +/- 66 g) in athletes compared with sedentary individuals. CONCLUSION: It seems unlikely that endurance and power training elicits distinctive patterns of LV enlargement in spinal cord injured athletes. Small adaptations of the left ventricle may occur with athletic training in the spinal cord injured athlete. Research within this population is complicated by extreme heterogeneity in important physical, physiological, and athletic-related variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gates et al. (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Spinal cord injury (n=26). Endurance and power training vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Left ventricular structural and functional measurements. Endurance and power training in spinal cord injured athletes did not elicit statistically significant differences in left ventricular structural or functional measurements compared to sedentary controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: