Key result
Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring device selection must be individualized according to patient requirements, disease severity, and ongoing clinical evolution.
Why the study?
Multiple noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring devices with distinct advantages and disadvantages have been developed to assess blood pressure, cardiac output, and tissue perfusion.
Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring devices offer various advantages and disadvantages, and their selection should be tailored to individual patient needs in the ICU.
May support tailored noninvasive monitoring in ICU patients; leaves open comparative outcome trials.
There has been considerable development in the field of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in recent years. Multiple devices have been proposed to assess blood pressure, cardiac output, and tissue perfusion. All have their own advantages and disadvantages and selection should be based on individual patient requirements and disease severity and adjusted according to ongoing patient evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Backer et al. (2020) studied this question. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring device selection must be individualized according to patient requirements, disease severity, and ongoing clinical evolution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: