The local-energy-transfer (LET) theory was used to calculate freely decaying turbulence for arbitrary initial conditions over a range of microscale-based Reynolds numbers 0.5 [les ] R λ ( t f ) [les ] 1009, where t f is the final time of computation. The predicted skewness factor S ( R λ ) agreed closely with the results of numerical simulations at low-to-moderate Reynolds numbers and followed the same general trend at larger values of R λ . It was also found that, for R λ ( t f ) [les ] 5, the LET calculation was almost indistinguishable from that of the direct-interaction approximation (DIA), with the difference between the two theories tending to zero as R λ( t f )∞ 0. Two-time correlation and propagator (or response) functions were also obtained. Tests of their scaling behaviour suggest that, contrary to general belief, the convective sweeping of the energy-containing range is much less important than the Kolmogorov timescale in determining inertial-range behaviour. This result raises questions about the accepted explanation for the failure of the direct-interaction approximation, thus motivating a discussion about the relevance of random Galilean invariance (RGI). It is argued that, for a properly constructed ensemble of transformations to inertial frames, invariance in every realization necessarily implies RGI. It is suggested that the defects of the direct-interaction approximation can be understood in terms of a failure to renormalize the stirring forces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McComb et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: