Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 1990American Journal of RoentgenologyOpen Access

Carotid artery disease assessed by color Doppler flow imaging: correlation with standard Doppler sonography and angiography.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Color Doppler flow imaging demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting carotid disease compared with angiography, and 91.3% to 97.8% accuracy in classifying stenosis severity versus standard Doppler.

Why the study?

Does color Doppler flow imaging accurately detect and classify carotid artery disease compared to standard Doppler sonography and angiography?

Population

180 patients with carotid artery disease (assessed across 360 carotid arteries and 60 bifurcations)

Comparison

Color Doppler flow imaging vs Standard Doppler sonography and intraarterial…

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

WSWolfgang SteinkeNewYork–Presbyterian HospitalCKChristof KloetzschUniversity of MannheimMHMichael G. HennericiUniversity of Stuttgart

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports noninvasive carotid assessment with color Doppler; leaves open validation against contemporary standards in larger cohorts.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=180)

Structured PICO

Does color Doppler flow imaging accurately detect and classify carotid artery disease compared to standard Doppler sonography and angiography?

P
Population
180 patients evaluated for carotid artery disease using color Doppler flow imaging, standard Doppler sonography, and angiography.
E
Exposure
Color Doppler flow imaging
C
Comparator
Standard Doppler sonography and intraarterial angiography
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and accuracy for the detection and classification of carotid disease/stenosissurrogate

Color Doppler flow imaging is a highly sensitive and accurate noninvasive modality for detecting and grading carotid artery stenosis, providing additional information on plaque morphology and hemodynamics.

Limitations

  • Four pseudoocclusions of the carotid artery were misdiagnosed as occluded by both color Doppler and angiography.

Cite This Study

Steinke et al. (1990) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid artery disease (n=180). Color Doppler flow imaging vs. Standard Doppler sonography and intraarterial angiography was evaluated on Sensitivity for the detection of carotid disease compared with angiography. Color Doppler flow imaging demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting carotid disease compared with angiography, and 91.3% to 97.8% accuracy in classifying stenosis severity versus standard Doppler.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63fa8bb28cf853587a88d4https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.154.5.2108543
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Duplex carotid sonography: criteria for stenosis, accuracy, and pitfalls.1985 · 122 citations
  2. 2Real-time Doppler Spectrum Analysis1982 · 82 citations
  3. 3Color-flow Doppler imaging of carotid artery abnormalities1988 · 73 citations
  4. 4Color-flow Doppler and conventional duplex scanning of the carotid bifurcation: prospective, double-blind, correlative study1989 · 48 citations
  5. 5Correlation of B-Mode Ultrasound Imaging and Arteriography With Pathologic Findings at Carotid Endarterectomy1985 · 278 citations