Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Constructed wetlands (CWs) attempt to simulate the physicochemical and biological processes that occur within a natural wetland and have been employed in recent decades for wastewater treatment. This work aims to review the use of CWs for domestic wastewater treatment in undeveloped or developing areas, including the amount of literature produced, the type of constructed wetland, the vegetation, the substrate, and the social benefits that have been achieved, through a qualitative methodology where different articles are collected from the Scopus and Web of Science databases after a strict revision by means of the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program). A total of 49 articles were selected, and co-occurrence and density maps were obtained; following this, three main themes and the five keywords with the highest correlation were identified. The literature analyzed in this work exposes different types of CWs where not only the hybrid, vertical, and horizontal flow systems stand out, but also the floating and aerated wetlands, which present high removal efficiencies. Additionally, new substrate materials, such as olote, palm shells, and coconut peat, and the ornamental plants usually used, such as Phragmites australis and Thypha latifolia, are discussed; however, new studies with vegetation that has been little studied but has a high potential to be implemented in areas with silvicultural characteristics stand out: Duranta repens, Pennisetum pedicellatum, and Pistia stratiotes. In conclusion, there is an advancement in the research of these systems, new configurations, substrates, and vegetation to treat domestic wastewater; in addition, these studies present an opportunity to continue studying the installation of CWs at the household level; however, compared to the other areas of application mentioned above, its implementation requires a greater challenge, since it requires a compact design and easy handling.
Domínguez-Solís et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: