Review of effective population size needed to maintain evolutionary potential in endangered species, suggesting lower estimates.
Maintaining genetic variation for future evolutionary change is an important issue for conservation biology. However, there is controversy over the effective population size ( N e ) required for endangered species to retain their evolutionary potential, with proposed sizes ranging from 500 to 5000. The highest estimate is based on the assumption that 90% of mutations are deleterious. We review the arguments for an effective size of 5000 and conclude that it assumes effective mutation rates that are too low, and heritabilities that are, in general, very high. We conclude that an N e of 500–1000 is appropriate at this time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franklin et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: