Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparative study of ocean backscatter depression due to surface oil has been carried out using Ku-and C-band scatterometers supported by some X-and C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. The depression of radar backscatter for both C-and Ku-band HH-polarized radiation has been measured for the incidence angle range from 20° to 50° on two days, September 16 and 17, 1983 on which the average wind and wave height conditions were 3-6 m/s, 0.3 m and ~10-14 m/s, 1.2 m, respectively. Results show that the depression in Ku-band backscatter increases from approximately 3-5 dB at 20° to ~10 dB or more at 30°-40° and then decreases at the larger incidence angles. Generally, the angular dependence of C-band backscatter depression was similar to that at Ku-band, but the peak depression was shifted to slightly larger angles and usually exceeded Ku peak 1-2 dB. The Ku-band results are in good agreement with previous work [9] that tentatively explained the angular results of backscatter depression on the basis of a selective damping of the first-order Bragg resonant waves by the oil film. This explanation, however, is inconsistent with the results of the present work when both C-and Ku-band are considered. The significance of the data is discussed in the context of present and future radar systems (e. g., the ESA ERS-1 SAR and the Radarsat SAR).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: