Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death compared to VKAs (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.81), with consistent benefits regardless of dependency.
Why the study?
Data on the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in patients with stroke attributable to AF who were dependent on the daily help of others at hospital discharge were scarce.
Does direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death compared to vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients with recent stroke who are dependent on daily help?
Observational (n=801)
Does direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death compared to vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients with recent stroke who are dependent on daily help?
Hazard Ratio: 0.58 (95% CI 0.42–0.81)
DOACs are associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, and death compared to VKAs in atrial fibrillation patients with recent stroke, and this benefit is maintained even in patients dependent on daily help at discharge.
May inform DOAC selection in dependent post-stroke AF patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background and Purpose: Data on the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with stroke attributable to atrial fibrillation (AF) who were dependent on the daily help of others at hospital discharge are scarce. Methods: Based on prospectively obtained data from the observational Novel-Oral-Anticoagulants-in-Ischemic-Stroke-Patients-longterm registry from Basel, Switzerland, we compared the occurrence of the primary outcome—the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death—among consecutive patients with AF-stroke treated with either VKAs or DOACs between patients dependent (defined as modified Rankin Scale score, 3–5) and patients independent at discharge. We used simple, adjusted, and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression to account for potential confounders. Results: We analyzed 801 patients (median age 80 years, 46% female), of whom 391 (49%) were dependent at discharge and 680 (85%) received DOACs. Over a total follow-up of 1216 patient-years, DOAC- compared to VKA-treated patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42–0.81]), as did independent compared to dependent patients (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40–0.71]). There was no evidence that the effect of anticoagulant type (DOAC versus VKA) on the hazard for the composite outcome differed between dependent (HRdependent, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45–1.01]) and independent patients (HRindependent, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.26–0.75]) in the simple model (Pinteraction=0.212). Adjusted (HRdependent, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.49–1.11] and HRindependent, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.30–0.87]; Pinteraction=0.284) and weighted models (HRdependent, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48–1.31] and HRindependent, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26–0.81]; Pinteraction=0.163) yielded concordant results. Secondary analyses focusing on the individual components of the composite outcome were consistent to the primary analyses. Conclusions: The benefits of DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation with a recent stroke were maintained among patients who were dependent on the help of others at discharge. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03826927.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meya et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation with recent stroke (n=801). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.81). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death compared to VKAs (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.81), with consistent benefits regardless of dependency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: