Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report that responses of normal human eosinophils toward the chemokines RANTES and interleukin-8 (IL-8) are modulated and upregulated by priming with IL-5. In a modified Boyden chamber assay, we studied migratory responses toward the members of the chemokine family RANTES, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) (C-C subfamily), and IL-8, platelet factor-4 (PF-4), and neutrophil-activating peptide-2 (NAP-2) (C-x-C subfamily). These chemokines were also studied in terms of actin polymerization and ([Ca2+]i)-mobilizing properties, intracellular signals that are thought to play a role during migratory responses. We found that eosinophils showed significant migratory responses toward RANTES and IL-8 at concentrations of 10(-9) to 10(-7) mol/L only after priming with IL-5 (10 pmol/L). At these concentrations, PF-4, NAP-2, MCP-1, and MIP-1 alpha induced no significant migratory responses after priming. Unprimed eosinophils only showed a significant migratory response toward RANTES (10(-6) mol/L). Changes in [Ca2+]i were found after addition of RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and NAP-2 (10 nmol/L) to unprimed eosinophils. RANTES (10(-9) to 10(-7) mol/L) significantly induced actin polymerization both in primed and unprimed eosinophils, whereas IL-8 (10(-9) to 10(-8) mol/L) and MIP-1 alpha (10(-8) mol/L) only induced actin polymerization after priming with IL-5. NAP-2, PF-4, and MCP-1 did not affect actin polymerization. These findings are further evidence for the hypothesis that cytokines like IL-5 and locally secreted chemokines like RANTES and IL-8 are both at the basis of specific eosinophil influx into the allergic inflammatory locus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schweizer et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: