Key result
Current management of atrial fibrillation involves individualized strategies including rhythm and rate control drugs, stroke prevention, catheter and cryoballoon ablation, and surgical procedures.
Why the study?
AF causes substantial worldwide morbidity and mortality, and rapid advancements in evidence and medical technology have evolved management options, warranting an updated review.
This comprehensive review summarizes current state-of-the-art evidence for the management of atrial fibrillation, including upstream therapy, rhythm and rate control, and interventional procedures.
AF risk stratification in Southern Africa may inform local decisions; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an ectopic rhythm originating in the atrium. AF is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and it is an enormous burden worldwide because of the high rates of morbidity, disability and mortality. Treatment of AF has become a hot spot in the field of cardiovascular medicine. Recently, increasing evidence and advancements in medical technology have helped us gain a better understanding of AF. As a result, management of AF has evolved in the past few years, so that we can better prevent and control AF. Current therapy for AF mainly includes drug therapy, catheter ablation, cryoballoon ablation, left atrial appendage closure and the maze procedure. The goal of this article is to update current treatment options for AF. We hope that this article will help deliver good care to AF patients based on the current state-of-the-art evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation management strategies (drug therapy, ablation, LAAC, surgery) was evaluated. Current management of atrial fibrillation involves individualized strategies including rhythm and rate control drugs, stroke prevention, catheter and cryoballoon ablation, and surgical procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: