Key result
The quantitative bedside cTnT test strip reader correlated closely with the laboratory-based cTnT ELISA (r = 0.98) and demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficiency for suspected myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does a quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T accurately measure cTnT compared to laboratory-based ELISA in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Observational (n=252)
Does a quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T accurately measure cTnT compared to laboratory-based ELISA in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
A quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T provides rapid and accurate results comparable to centralized laboratory testing, facilitating the diagnostic workup of suspected myocardial infarction.
Bedside quantitative cTnT assay achieves strong lab correlation; extends point-of-care troponin testing for suspected ACS.
BACKGROUND: In the evaluation of chest pain patients, whole blood bedside assays of highly specific cardiac molecules may be an attractive alternative to centralized clinical chemistry testing. We now report on an optimized test strip device for cardiac troponin T (cTnT) that can be analyzed by a cardiac reader for quantitative assessment of the test result. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cTnT test strip reader measures, via a CCD camera, the reflectance of the signal line. For quantitative analysis, a calibration curve was constructed from 1030 samples of 252 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes. In a method comparison of 140 samples, the quantitative results of the cTnT test strip reader correlated closely with the results of the cTnT ELISA (r = 0.98; y = 0.85x + 0. 002). Within-run and day-to-day (n = 10) mean CVs were between 11% and 16%, respectively. The cross-reactivity with skeletal troponin T was <0.02%. In patients with myocardial infarction, 45% and 91% of all samples were positive on admission and at 4-8 h after the onset of symptoms, respectively. ROC curve analysis demonstrated a comparable efficiency of the cTnT test strip reader and the laboratory-based cTnT ELISA in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: It is now possible to quantitatively determine cTnT at the patient's bedside with a rapid and convenient test device. This will facilitate the diagnostic work up of patients with suspected myocardial cell necrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller-Bardorff et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndromes (n=252). Quantitative bedside cTnT test strip reader vs. Laboratory-based cTnT ELISA was evaluated on Correlation of quantitative results between the bedside assay and ELISA (r = 0.98). The quantitative bedside cTnT test strip reader correlated closely with the laboratory-based cTnT ELISA (r = 0.98) and demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficiency for suspected myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: