Key result
An isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus resulted in no significant or meaningful change in countermovement jump performance metrics.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine if an isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus was sufficient to elicit postactivation potentiation in a countermovement jump for recreationally trained individuals.
Does an isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus improve countermovement jump performance in recreationally trained individuals?
Does an isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus improve countermovement jump performance in recreationally trained individuals?
An isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus did not elicit postactivation potentiation to improve countermovement jump performance in recreationally trained individuals.
Isometric quarter squats may elicit PAP in recreational CMJ; leaves open confirmation in athletes and performance translation.
The purpose of the study was to determine if an isometric quarter squat was sufficient to elicit postactivation potentiation (PAP) in a countermovement jump (CMJ) for recreationally trained individuals (n = 22). The isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus consisted of three sets of six second maximal voluntary contractions against a custom made apparatus. The conditioning stimulus was designed to acutely enhance CMJ performance by stimulating PAP, in turn improving indicators of CMJ performance which included eccentric rate of force development (ERFD), mean rate of force development (MRFD), peak rate of force development (PRFD), reactive strength index (RSI), and peak power (PP). CMJ performance was tested at one, five, ten, and fifteen minutes post-conditioning stimulus to identify the optimal recovery time for optimal performance. Statistical analysis was carried out using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and no significant or meaningful change was found in ERFD, MRFD, PRFD, RSI, or PP. The overall power was small for all variables suggesting that the ability of the current study to observe an effect that might have existed was very unlikely. Effect size was also small in all variables suggesting that the change pre to post-testing was not meaningful. Some critical factors that may have contributed to the results included the individual’s ability to potentiate, body positioning during conditioning stimulus, and level of conditioning of subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell W. Dropp (2020) studied this question. Isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus vs. Pre-testing baseline was evaluated on Countermovement jump performance indicators (ERFD, MRFD, PRFD, RSI, and PP). An isometric quarter squat conditioning stimulus resulted in no significant or meaningful change in countermovement jump performance metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: