Key result
The high-frequency component (HFp) stabilization point of heart rate variability showed a strong relationship with the ventilatory threshold, whereas the SD1 stabilization point did not.
Why the study?
Does heart rate variability correlate with the ventilatory threshold during incremental exercise in healthy moderately trained males?
Cross-Sectional
Does heart rate variability correlate with the ventilatory threshold during incremental exercise in healthy moderately trained males?
Effect estimate: r = 0.86 and 0.087
The high-frequency component (HFp) stabilization point of heart rate variability shows a strong relationship with the ventilatory threshold in moderately trained healthy males.
HRV inflection points may aid noninvasive VT detection in exercise testing; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: During incremental exercise, heart rate variability (HRV) has been shown to display distinct stabilization and inflection points, which have been used to indirectly detect the ventilatory threshold (VT). METHODS: ) performed an incremental test on a cycle ergometer until volitional exhaustion with both R-R intervals and respiratory indices recorded. HRV was quantified using both nonlinear (Poincare plot; short-term variability SD1) and spectral analysis of the R-R intervals (high-frequency component; HFp). The VT was identified using the V-slope method. The relationship between HRV parameters and the VT was assessed using both a paired t-test and Pearson's product correlation. In addition, Bland and Altman plots were used to quantify the mean difference along with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: When expressed as the corresponding heart rate values, both the SD1 and the HFp stabilization points revealed a strong (r = 0·86 and 0·087, respectively) correlation with the VT. However, only for SD1 this relationship was different to the VT (t-test). The Bland-Altman plots supported these findings showing wide limits of agreement present for SD1 and the VT whilst the relationship between HFp and the VT revealed narrower limits. CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be a relationship present between the VT and the SD1 stabilization point in moderately trained healthy males, whereas the HFp stabilization point revealed a strong relationship with the VT when expressed as heart rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grannell et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy moderately trained males. Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters (SD1 and HFp) was evaluated on Correlation between HRV parameters (SD1 and HFp stabilization points) and the ventilatory threshold (VT) (r = 0.86 and 0.087). The high-frequency component (HFp) stabilization point of heart rate variability showed a strong relationship with the ventilatory threshold, whereas the SD1 stabilization point did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: