Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss a number of policy issues associated with proposals by proponents of the Regular Education Initiative to reform special education practice by creating a more integrated system of general education that better serves mildly handicapped and “other special needs” students in mainstream settings. The paper focuses on five issues and concerns with the specific proposals offered by Reynolds, Wang, and Waiberg, including (a) the clarity of goals and objectives, (b) potential conflicts in the values driving educational policy, (c) arguable assumptions about political and practical feasibility, and (d) the adequacy of the evidence to support recommended changes from a policy perspective. It is concluded that additional research and policy analysis are needed to provide a better understanding of the implications and consequences of various proposals associated with the Regular Education Initiative and to identify alternative solutions that might achieve constructive changes within the broad boundaries of present policy.
McKinney et al. (Thu,) studied this question.