Key result
The CardIAc artificial intelligence tool quantified biventricular volumes and function with high accuracy, reducing processing time by 447.7 seconds per patient compared to manual quantification.
Why the study?
Clinical use of artificial intelligence for quantifying biventricular function, volume, mass, and EF is hindered by poor reproducibility with daily practice cases.
Does a new artificial intelligence tool accurately and rapidly quantify biventricular function and volumes in cardiac magnetic resonance compared to manual specialist quantification?
Observational (n=189)
Yes
Does a new artificial intelligence tool accurately and rapidly quantify biventricular function and volumes in cardiac magnetic resonance compared to manual specialist quantification?
Mean Difference: 447.7 (95% CI 407.6–487.8)
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 452.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel artificial intelligence approach can automatically quantify biventricular volumes and ejection fraction on cardiac MRI in seconds with accuracy comparable to manual specialist assessment.
May support AI for biventricular quantification; leaves open robustness and reproducibility in daily practice.
Background: Artificial intelligence techniques have shown great potential in cardiology, especially in quantifying cardiac biventricular function, volume, mass, and ejection fraction (EF). However, its use in clinical practice is not straightforward due to its poor reproducibility with cases from daily practice, among other reasons. Objectives: To validate a new artificial intelligence tool in order to quantify the cardiac biventricular function (volume, mass, and EF). To analyze its robustness in the clinical area, and the computational times compared with conventional methods. Methods: A total of 189 patients were analyzed: 89 from a regional center and 100 from a public center. The method proposes two convolutional networks that include anatomical information of the heart to reduce classification errors. Results: A high concordance (Pearson coefficient) was observed between manual quantification and the proposed quantification of cardiac function (0.98, 0.92, 0.96 and 0.8 for volumes and biventricular EF) in about 5 seconds per study. Conclusions: This method quantifies biventricular function and volumes in seconds with an accuracy equivalent to that of a specialist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curiale et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Various heart conditions and normal cardiac function (n=189). CardIAc artificial intelligence tool vs. Manual quantification was evaluated on Processing time per patient (MD 447.7 sec, 95% CI 407.6-487.8, p=<0.001). The CardIAc artificial intelligence tool quantified biventricular volumes and function with high accuracy, reducing processing time by 447.7 seconds per patient compared to manual quantification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: