Key result
Higher waist circumference was associated with an increased risk of stroke compared to the lowest category (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.18-1.40), as were waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios.
Why the study?
Does increased abdominal adiposity (measured by waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, or waist-to-height ratio) increase the risk of stroke?
Meta-Analysis
Does increased abdominal adiposity (measured by waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, or waist-to-height ratio) increase the risk of stroke?
Relative Risk: 1.28 (95% CI 1.18–1.4)
Measures of abdominal adiposity, including waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, are positively associated with an increased risk of stroke.
Abdominal adiposity measures may raise stroke risk; supports targeted prevention research but should not yet alter practice.
OBJECTIVE: Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio, which are the indicators or measures of abdominal adiposity, have long been hypothesized to increase the risk of stroke; yet evidence accumulated till date is not conclusive. Here, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize evidences of the association between these measures of abdominal adiposity and the risk of stroke. METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 2015. Two investigators independently conducted the study selection and data extraction. Dose-response relationships were assessed by the generalized least squares trend estimation, while the summary effect estimates were evaluated by the use of fixed- or random-effect models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the potential sources of heterogeneity and the robustness of the pooled estimation. Publication bias of the literature was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's test. RESULTS: Altogether 15 prospective cohort studies were identified in this study. The summary of relative risks (95% confidence intervals) of stroke for the highest versus the lowest categories was 1.28 (1.18-1.40) for waist circumference, 1.32 (1.21-1.44) for waist-to-hip ratio, and 1.49 (1.24-1.78) for waist-to-height ratio. For a 10-cm increase in waist circumference, the relative risk of stroke increased by 10%; for a 0.1-unit increase in waist-to-hip ratio, the relative risk increased by 16%; and for a 0.05-unit increase in waist-to-height ratio, the relative risk increased by 13%. There was evidence of a nonlinear association between waist-to-hip ratio and stroke risk, Pnonlinearity=0.028. CONCLUSION: Findings from our meta-analysis indicated that waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were positively associated with the risk of stroke, particularly ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Stroke. Abdominal adiposity (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio) vs. Lowest categories of abdominal adiposity was evaluated on Risk of stroke (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.40). Higher waist circumference was associated with an increased risk of stroke compared to the lowest category (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.18-1.40), as were waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: