Key result
DOACs significantly reduced net clinical outcomes compared to VKAs in high-risk AF patients (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.92; P<0.001), but not in low-risk patients (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.03; P=0.154).
Why the study?
Limited accessibility of DOACs in resource-constrained settings makes it important to identify AF patient subgroups where VKAs achieve comparable net clinical outcomes.
Do DOACs improve net clinical outcomes compared to VKAs in specific subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis
Yes
Do DOACs improve net clinical outcomes compared to VKAs in specific subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation?
Renal function, age, and BMI are key predictors of DOAC treatment benefit in AF, suggesting lower-risk patients may derive similar outcomes with VKAs in resource-constrained settings.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, limited accessibility in resource-constrained settings makes it important to identify patient subgroups in whom VKAs may achieve comparable net clinical outcomes (NCOs). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify AF patient subgroups and explore potential predictors of differential treatment benefit to inform anticoagulant selection where DOAC access is limited. METHODS: Individual patient data from the COMBINE-AF data set pooling 4 pivotal randomized trials of DOACs vs VKAs in AF were analyzed. Model-based clustering identified patient subgroups. Heterogeneity of treatment effects for the NCO-a composite of all-cause death, disabling or fatal stroke, and intracranial or fatal bleeding- was explored using Cox regression and gradient boosting analyses adapted for time-to-event data. DOACs significantly reduced NCOs in the high-risk cluster (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92; P < 0.001), but not in the low-risk cluster (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85-1.03; P = 0.154, p-interaction = 0.115). Primary predictors of treatment heterogeneity were renal function, age, and BMI; no statistically significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function, age, and BMI are key determinants of anticoagulant treatment benefit in AF. In regions with limited access to DOACs, these findings suggest that some lower-risk patient profiles may derive similar outcomes with VKAs, although differences were not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Said et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Net clinical outcomes (NCO) - a composite of all-cause death, disabling or fatal stroke, and intracranial or fatal bleeding (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p=< 0.001). DOACs significantly reduced net clinical outcomes compared to VKAs in high-risk AF patients (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.92; P<0.001), but not in low-risk patients (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.03; P=0.154).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: