Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We show that the conventional dangling bond picture is insufficient to explain scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images of III-V (110) semiconductor surfaces. Voltage-dependent STM images combined with ab initio electronic structure calculations give evidence that surface resonances fundamentally change the STM images of InP, GaP, and GaAs (110). The occupied dangling bond state dominates the images at negative voltages, but its counterpart, the empty dangling bond state, is only of relevance for small positive voltages. The empty state images are rather governed by empty resonances which lead to a 90^∘{} rotation of the apparent rows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebert et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: