Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 25, 2019Clinical Oral Implants ResearchOpen Access

Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model‐free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double‐blind self‐controlled clinical trial

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SPShaoxia PanNational Clinical ResearchDGDanni GuoStomatology HospitalYZYongsheng ZhouKing University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6543631ee39a729139ddc3https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13447
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant‐supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review2018 · 115 citations
  2. 2Complete digital workflow for the production of implant‐supported single‐unit monolithic crowns2013 · 120 citations
  3. 3Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures2016 · 87 citations
  4. 4Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial2016 · 155 citations
  5. 5Digital versus Analog Procedures for the Prosthetic Restoration of Single Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up2018 · 104 citations