What does this research mean for the field?

Restorative resection for middle-third rectal cancers is pathologically justified when technically possible, because patients with tumor spread that would be left behind by this limited resection have very poor survival rates regardless. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

November 1, 1974Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

A Comparison of Restorative Resection of Carcinoma of the Middle Third of the Rectum with Abdominoperineal Excision

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

JPJ. C. B. PenfoldPrince of Wales Hospital

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

J. C. B. Penfold (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6543d98a6cbd62b5032dcc https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1974.tb03902.x

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

November 1, 1974Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

A Comparison of Restorative Resection of Carcinoma of the Middle Third of the Rectum with Abdominoperineal Excision

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

JPJ. C. B. PenfoldPrince of Wales Hospital

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

J. C. B. Penfold (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6543d98a6cbd62b5032dcc https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1974.tb03902.x

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark