Key result
Patients who developed syncope during a head-up tilt test exhibited a significantly more pronounced decrease in stroke volume (-27.2 ml vs -9.7 ml) and cardiac output at 5 minutes after tilting compared to non-responders.
Why the study?
Does the early hemodynamic response to the tilt test differ between patients who develop syncope and those who do not?
Observational (n=126)
No
Does the early hemodynamic response to the tilt test differ between patients who develop syncope and those who do not?
Patients who develop syncope during a tilt test exhibit a significantly more pronounced decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output by the 5th minute of tilting compared to those who do not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Greater 5-min SV/CO decline during HUTT in syncope patients; leaves open whether ICG adds diagnostic value beyond standard testing.
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the differences in the early hemodynamic response to the tilt test (HUTT) in patients with and without syncope using impedance cardiography (ICG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients (72 female/48 male; 37 ±17 years) were divided into a group with syncope (HUTT(+), n = 45 patients) and a group without syncope (HUTT(-), n = 81 patients). ECG and ICG signals were continuously recorded during the whole examination, allowing the calculation of heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO) for every beat. The hemodynamic parameters (averaged over 1 min) were analyzed at the following points of the HUTT: the last minute of resting, the period immediately after the tilt (0 min), 1 min and 5 min after the maneuver. The absolute changes of HR, SV and CO were calculated for 0, 1, and 5 min after the maneuver in relation to the values at rest (ΔHR, ΔSV, ΔCO). Also, the percentage changes were calculated (HRi, SVi, COi). RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in absolute and percentage changes of hemodynamic parameters immediately after and 1 min after tilting. Significant differences between the HUTT(+) and HUTT(-) groups were observed in the 5(th) min of tilting: for ΔSV (-27.2 ±21.2 ml vs. -9.7 ±27.2 ml; p = 0.03), ΔCO (-1.78 ±1.62 l/min vs. -0.34 ±2.48 l/min; p = 0.032), COi (-30 ±28% vs. -0.2 ±58%; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In the 5(th) min the decrease of hemodynamic parameters (ΔSV, ΔCO, COi) was significantly more pronounced in HUTT(+) patients in comparison to the HUTT(-) group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koźluk et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Unexplained syncope (n=126). Positive head-up tilt test (syncope development) vs. Negative head-up tilt test (no syncope) was evaluated on Change in stroke volume (∆SV) at 5 minutes after tilting (ml) (p=0.03). Patients who developed syncope during a head-up tilt test exhibited a significantly more pronounced decrease in stroke volume (-27.2 ml vs -9.7 ml) and cardiac output at 5 minutes after tilting compared to non-responders.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: