Why the study?
Does transthoracic impedance monitoring during a 70 degrees head-up tilt test predict syncope in patients with unexplained recurrent syncope?
Does transthoracic impedance monitoring during a 70 degrees head-up tilt test predict syncope in patients with unexplained recurrent syncope?
Transthoracic impedance can detect differences in central hemodynamics to predict syncope during a head-up tilt test with high specificity when combined with peripheral hemodynamic variables.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support combined impedance-hemodynamic monitoring in tilt testing for syncope; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We determined whether early changes in central haemodynamics, as determined by transthoracic impedance, induced by a 70 degrees head-up tilt (HUT) test could predict syncope. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and central haemodynamics [pre-ejection period and rapid left ventricular ejection time ( T (1)), slow ejection time ( T (2)) and d Z /d t (max) (where Z is thoracic impedance), assessed by the transthoracic impedance technique], were recorded during supine rest and during a 45 min 70 degrees HUT test in 68 patients (40+/-2 years) with a history of unexplained recurrent syncope. We found that 38 patients (42+/-3 years) had a symptomatic outcome to 70 degrees HUT (fainters) and 30 (39+/-2 years) had a negative outcome (non-fainters). When measured between 5 and 10 min of 70 degrees HUT, T (2) had increased significantly only in the fainters, and a change in T (2) of >40 ms from baseline predicted a positive outcome with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 70%. During supine rest prior to 70 degrees HUT, the fainters exhibited a shorter T (2) than non-fainters (183+/-10 compared with 233+/-14 ms; P <0.01), and a T (2) of <199 ms predicted a positive outcome to 70 degrees HUT with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 63%. Incorporation of the changes that occurred from rest to 70 degrees HUT in other haemodynamic variables (heart rate >11 beats/min, systolic pressure <2 mmHg, diastolic pressure <7 mmHg and pulse pressure <-3 mmHg) increased the specificity to 97% and the positive predictive value to 93%. Thus transthoracic impedance could detect differences in central haemodynamics between fainters and non-fainters during supine rest and during the initial period of 70 degrees HUT with a consistent sensitivity and specificity when combined with peripheral haemodynamic variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellard et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: