Key result
Head-up tilt testing at 60° yielded similar diagnostic rates for orthostatic intolerance compared to 70° and 80° (p>0.05), but resulted in significantly less psychological fear (p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does the tilt angle (60°, 70°, or 80°) affect diagnostic rates, time to positive response, and psychological fear during head-up tilt testing in children with unexplained syncope?
RCT (n=174)
Randomly divided
Does the tilt angle (60°, 70°, or 80°) affect diagnostic rates, time to positive response, and psychological fear during head-up tilt testing in children with unexplained syncope?
A 60° tilt angle is recommended for head-up tilt testing in children, as it provides similar diagnostic yield to steeper angles while causing significantly less psychological fear.
60° tilt may minimize psychological fear without reducing diagnostic yield in children; leaves open optimal pediatric protocol confirmation in prospective trials.
This study aimed at examining three tilt angle-based positive responses and the time to positive response in a head-up tilt test for children with orthostatic intolerance, and the psychological fear experienced at the three angles during head-up tilt test. A total of 174 children, including 76 boys and 98 girls, aged from 4 to 18 years old (mean 11.3±2.8 years old), with unexplained syncope, were randomly divided into three groups, to undergo head-up tilt test at the angles of 60°, 70° and 80°, respectively. The diagnostic rates and times were analysed, and Wong-Baker face pain rating scale was used to access the children's psychological fear. There were no significant differences in diagnostic rates of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and vasovagal syncope at different tilt angles during the head-up tilt test (p>0.05). There was a significant difference, however, in the psychological fear at different tilt angles utilising the Kruskal-Wallis test (χ2=36.398, p<0.01). It was mildest at tilt angle 60° utilising the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p<0.01). A positive rank correlation was found between the psychological fear and the degree of tilt angle (r(s)=0.445, p<0.01). Positive response appearance time was 15.1±14.0 minutes at 60° for vasovagal syncope children. There was no significant difference in the time to positive response, at different tilt angles during the head-up tilt test for vasovagal syncope or for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Hence, it is suggested that a tilt angle of 60° and head-up tilt test time of 45 minutes should be suitable for children with vasovagal syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Unexplained syncope / Orthostatic intolerance (n=174). Head-up tilt test at 60° vs. Head-up tilt test at 70° and 80° was evaluated on Diagnostic rates of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and vasovagal syncope (p=>0.05). Head-up tilt testing at 60° yielded similar diagnostic rates for orthostatic intolerance compared to 70° and 80° (p>0.05), but resulted in significantly less psychological fear (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Cardiology in the Young