Key result
Direct monobody-binding assays and single-channel recordings of a Fluc channel homolog revealed a doubly occupied blocked state with substantial negative cooperativity between the two blocking sites.
The study reveals a novel trimolecular blocking behavior with a doubly occupied blocked state and substantial negative cooperativity between the two blocking sites in Fluc channels.
The Fluc family is a set of small membrane proteins forming F(-)-specific electrodiffusive ion channels that rescue microorganisms from F(-) toxicity during exposure to weakly acidic environments. The functional channel is built as a dual-topology homodimer with twofold symmetry parallel to the membrane plane. Fluc channels are blocked by nanomolar-affinity fibronectin-domain monobodies originally selected from phage-display libraries. The unusual symmetrical antiparallel dimeric architecture of Flucs demands that the two chemically equivalent monobody-binding epitopes reside on opposite ends of the channel, a double-sided blocking situation that has never before presented itself in ion channel biophysics. However, it is not known if both sites can be simultaneously occupied, and if so, whether monobodies bind independently or cooperatively to their transmembrane epitopes. Here, we use direct monobody-binding assays and single-channel recordings of a Fluc channel homolog to reveal a novel trimolecular blocking behavior that reveals a doubly occupied blocked state. Kinetic analysis of single-channel recordings made with monobody on both sides of the membrane shows substantial negative cooperativity between the two blocking sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turman et al. (2015) studied this question. Monobodies was evaluated on Monobody binding and single-channel blocking behavior. Direct monobody-binding assays and single-channel recordings of a Fluc channel homolog revealed a doubly occupied blocked state with substantial negative cooperativity between the two blocking sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: