Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solid [{Cu(MePY2)} 2 O 2 ] 2+ is spectroscopically characterized using resonance Raman and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, for which the former technique probes the nature of the O−O bond and the latter defines the Cu−Cu interaction. In contrast to the crystal structure obtained for [{Cu(MePY2)} 2 O 2 ] 2+, which shows an “intermediate” Cu 2 O 2 core (Cu−Cu = 3.4 Å and O−O = 1.6 Å), resonance Raman peaks characteristic of both a side-on peroxide-bridged dicopper(II) core and bis-μ-oxo dicopper(III) core are observed. The bis-μ-oxo isomer is estimated to be present at approximately 5−20%. A good fit is obtained for EXAFS data for solid [{Cu(MePY2)} 2 O 2 ] 2+ using an 80:20 ratio of Cu−Cu separations of 3.6 Å (characteristic of a side-on peroxide-bridged copper core) and 2.8 Å (associated with a bis-μ-oxo dicopper core). Analysis of the edge region places an upper limit on the amount of bis-μ-oxo isomer present in the solid at 40%. The factors governing the presence of bis-μ-oxo and/or side-on peroxide cores in solution for differing ligand systems are considered, and the contribution of the bite angle of the equatorial nitrogen atom donors is explored. The reactivity of [{Cu(MePY2)} 2 O 2 ] 2+ in solution is correlated with the presence of the bis-μ-oxo core, using frontier molecular orbital theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pidcock et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: