This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Photosystem II membranes, dialyzed against a Cl(-)-free buffer to remove bound Cl-, lost about 65% of the control activity. A light-intensity study of the Cl(-)-free membranes showed that all PS II centers were able to evolve oxygen at about 35% of the control rate when measured in Cl(-)-free medium. The Cl(-)-depleted membranes were immediately (< 15 s) reactivated to 85-90% of the original activity by the addition of fairly high concentrations of Cl- (Kd = 0.5 mM), but both Cl- and the activity were promptly lost when the membranes immediately after reactivation were diluted in a Cl(-)-free medium. However, stabilization of Cl(-)-binding could be accomplished by prolonged incubation in the presence of Cl-. The transition to stable binding, followed using 36Cl-, occurred over several minutes. The stable binding was further characterized by a Kd of 20 microM and a t1/2 for dissociation of about 1h [Lindberg et al. (1993) Photosynth. Res. 38, 401-408]. The effects on S2 signals of removal of Cl- were studied using EPR. The depletion of Cl- was accompanied by a shift in intensity toward the g = 4.1 signal at the expense of the multiline signal. When Cl- or Br- but not F- was added to the depleted PS II membranes, the original distribution of the signals was immediately (< 30 s) restored. We propose that Cl(-)-binding responsible for high oxygen-evolution activity and normal EPR properties of the S2 state may occur either as high affinity (Kd = 20 microM) and slowly exchanging (t1/2 = 1 h), or as low affinity (Kd = 0.5 mM) and rapidly exchanging (t1/2 < 15 s). Our results suggest that Br- but not F- has a mode of binding similar to that of Cl-. The high-affinity state is the normal state of binding, but once Cl- has been removed, it will first rebind as low-affinity, rapidly exchanging followed by conversion into a high-affinity, slowly exchanging mode of binding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindberg et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: