Key result
The CART-I ring-type wearable photoplethysmography sensor detected induced ventricular arrhythmias with an overall sensitivity of 94%, including 100% for ventricular fibrillation and 90% for ventricular tachycardia.
Why the study?
Ventricular arrhythmias frequently lead to sudden cardiac death, and while ring-type wearable PPG sensors may offer accurate early detection, they have not yet been investigated.
Does a ring-type wearable photoplethysmography sensor accurately detect induced ventricular arrhythmias compared to reference electrocardiogram in patients undergoing VA induction procedures?
Observational (n=25)
No
Does a ring-type wearable photoplethysmography sensor accurately detect induced ventricular arrhythmias compared to reference electrocardiogram in patients undergoing VA induction procedures?
A ring-type wearable PPG sensor can detect induced ventricular arrhythmias with high sensitivity, suggesting its potential utility for continuous ambulatory monitoring.
Supports wearable PPG development for VA detection; leaves open real-world accuracy and clinical utility pending validation.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are most frequently the onset of sudden cardiac death, and early detection is key for survival. Limited studies suggest that wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors can detect VA. Ring-type wearable PPG sensors may be more accurate; however, they have not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to show the sensitivity of a ring-type wearable PPG sensor to detect induced VA. METHODS: Patients undergoing a procedure involving VA induction were included. The CART-I was positioned on the finger during the procedure, and PPG and reference electrocardiogram data were collected. A loss of cardiac output was defined as a flatline, or a decrease in amplitude of ≥50%. Sensitivity was calculated using a contingency table. Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the agreement between PPG- and electrocardiogram-derived arrhythmia durations. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, of whom 25 were included: defibrillation threshold testing (n = 16), ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation (n = 8), and electrophysiological study (n = 1). A total of 67 VA episodes, of which 27 were ventricular fibrillation (VF) and 40 were VT episodes, were recorded. A loss of cardiac output was observed on the tachograms of all VF episodes and 36 VT episodes (90%). The sensitivity was 94% (VF, 100%; VT, 90%). The mean difference in VA duration was 0.1 seconds (95% limits of agreement -1.4 to 1.7), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.998 (95% confidence interval, 0.997-0.999), indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a ring-type wearable device can detect, with high sensitivity, changes in arterial pulse flow during induced VA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steijn et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Ventricular arrhythmias (n=25). CART-I ring-type wearable photoplethysmography sensor vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated on Sensitivity to detect induced ventricular arrhythmias. The CART-I ring-type wearable photoplethysmography sensor detected induced ventricular arrhythmias with an overall sensitivity of 94%, including 100% for ventricular fibrillation and 90% for ventricular tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: