Key result
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation produced a statistically significant but modest reduction in PSQI-K scores compared to sham stimulation (mean 4.24 vs 5.48, p<0.001) in healthy adults.
Why the study?
tcVNS influences autonomic regulation and sleep in clinical settings, but evidence in healthy populations is limited.
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve sleep quality, mood, and autonomic function in healthy adults?
RCT (n=29)
Double-blind
1:1 to one of two sequences: Active -> Sham or Sham -> Active
No
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve sleep quality, mood, and autonomic function in healthy adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.24% vs 5.48%
p-value: p=<0.001
In healthy adults, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is safe and produces statistically significant but clinically modest improvements in subjective sleep quality, with no significant effects on mood or heart rate variability.
No clinically meaningful sleep benefit in healthy adults; extends evidence of limited tVNS effects on mood and HRV.
Background: Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tcVNS) has been reported to influence autonomic regulation and sleep in various clinical settings.However, evidence in healthy populations is limited.This study investigated the effects of tcVNS on subjective sleep quality, mood, and autonomic function in healthy adults.Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in which 29 healthy participants underwent two four-week stimulation phases (Active and Sham).Active stimulation was delivered at subthreshold intensity, whereas Sham stimulation involved identical device use without electrical current.Outcomes included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Korean version (PSQI-K), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and daily heart rate variability (HRV) indices collected using a validated smartphone-based application.Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze questionnaire scores.Results: PSQI-K scores showed a statistically significant but modest reduction during Active stimulation compared with Baseline (P = 0.013) and Sham (corrected P < 0.001), although the mean change did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference.No significant changes were observed for BDI-II or HAM-D.HRV responses were heterogeneous across participants, with no significant group-level differences.No serious adverse events occurred, and mild transient ear discomfort or tingling was reported by 3 participants (10.3%) during Active stimulation.Conclusion: This exploratory pilot trial suggests that tcVNS was safe and well tolerated and may produce modest changes in subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.The absence of mood effects likely reflects low baseline symptom burden.These findings provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence that stimulation parameters may warrant further investigation, and confirmation in adequately powered trials and clinical populations is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Healthy adults (n=29). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tcVNS) vs. Sham stimulation (identical device use without electrical current) was evaluated on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Korean version (PSQI-K) score (p=<0.001). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation produced a statistically significant but modest reduction in PSQI-K scores compared to sham stimulation (mean 4.24 vs 5.48, p<0.001) in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: